Columbia rally for Michael Brown aims civil rights message at new generation

Columbia Missourian | Aug 22, 2014

COLUMBIA — In 1977, Princeton graduate student C.W. Dawson Jr. was pulled over in Trenton, N.J. The police officer told him that he matched the description of a robbery suspect. Dawson said that next thing he knew, he was thrown into the back of the police vehicle.

“I got stopped for D.W.B.,” Dawson said. “Driving while black.”

Fast-forward to 2010. Graduate student Dawson had earned a doctoral degree and was lecturing on social and political issues in philosophy at a conference in New York City.

“I get stopped, and I’m still fitting a description,” said Dawson, currently a minister with Dawson Journeys Ministry. “The point? It still goes on.”

On Thursday evening, Dawson was one of several speakers at an NAACP-sponsored rally outside the Boone County Courthouse. Nearly two weeks after Michael Brown’s death in Ferguson, people came together to demand justice, to assert their place in the decadeslong battle for civil rights and to show support for Brown’s family.

Rallygoers convened at 6 p.m. as volunteers passed out water bottles to battle the 90-degree heat. The diverse audience of several hundred filled up the amphitheater outside the courthouse, spilling onto the grass and surrounding ledges. College students stood with their bikes, and children climbed on statues. Many attendees held signs reading “End police brutality now” and “Cameras see more than color.” Police were absent from the scene.

The evening began with chants of “What do we want? Justice! When do we want it? Now!” and what has become a common rally cry for Ferguson protesters: “Hands up, don’t shoot!”

Speakers demanded more transparency from St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Robert McCulloch into the investigation of Brown’s shooting. They also demanded that the officer who shot Brown be held responsible.

“Why are they doing this behind closed doors? Because when you do it in front of a grand jury, you don’t get to see anything,” said David Tyson Smith, attorney at Smith & Parnell LLC. “This officer should be arrested. There should be a public hearing.”

Speakers also called for McCulloch to step aside in favor of a special prosecutor.

Mary Ratliff, the NAACP Missouri State Conference president, compared the rally to protests during the 1960s.

“We are training our young people,” Ratliff said. “Many times, young people didn’t realize we had to fight for them to sit at the restaurant, fight for them to be able to go to the restrooms. This has let them know that the fight must go on. Every generation must fight.”

Like many ’60s-era protests, attendees joined together in song a few times during the course of the evening.

Near the beginning of the rally, Columbia resident Lucretia Murray led the crowd in the singing of the civil rights era hymn “Ain’t Gonna Let Nobody Turn Me ‘Round.”

“It was one that was sung hundreds and hundreds of times during the civil rights movement,” Murray said. “We’re fighting for some of the same things, and I was just talking to my children last night, and they were saying, ‘Well, didn’t Poppy and Grandma fight for these things already?’ Well, yes, and the fact of the matter is that it might be an ongoing battle for the rest of our lives.”

Timothy Gist, a senior at Columbia College and member of the MU NAACP, was one of many from the younger generation who attended the rally.

Gist, who is originally from St. Louis, believes that strength comes in numbers.

“I feel like if the people of Columbia apply the right amount of pressure on the people who have political power, you are able to add more pressure to law enforcement, to the prosecuting attorney,”  Gist said.

Adolphus Pruitt, president of the St. Louis NAACP, has spoken to members of the Brown family on multiple occasions and said they were overwhelmed and thankful for the displays of support that have occurred nationwide over the past couple of weeks.

“They thought it was amazing that the rest of the country and these folks from all over the world are sympathizing to support their cause for justice in finding out what happened to their son,” Pruitt said. “They hope that this will prevent this happening to any other child in the future.”

Dawson found hope in the show of solidarity that brought different races, genders, religions and sexual orientations together in support of a common goal.

“We will put our hands up,” Dawson said. “Because it used to mean that we surrender. We hold our hands up to signify that we’re still here. We hold our hands up to let the world know that we are somebody, because you can imprison us, you can shoot at us, you can kill somebody; we hold our hands up to say no more.”

UPDATE: Missouri laboratory certified to test for Ebola

Columbia Missourian | Oct 17, 2014

JEFFERSON CITY — As news of potential Ebola cases captivates the nation, Gov. Jay Nixon assured Missouri residents Friday that the state’s health network was prepared to handle possible cases. Missouri now has one of approximately 20 laboratories across the country that can test potential Ebola specimens.

“What we tried to do is be consistent, to be prepared, to be calm and to be vigilant,” Nixon said during a press conference at the Missouri State Public Health Laboratory in Jefferson City. “We hope that gives fellow Missouri residents confidence that we have a public health system … that is on point and prepared. And should the need arise, we have the resources to adequately deal with the challenge.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has certified the Missouri State Public Health Laboratory as an Ebola testing laboratory in order to investigate and control the disease in the state. Although the lab has received all proper equipment and protective garb, it has not yet received any Ebola samples, said Gail Vasterling, director of the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services.

“There’s not been a single reported case of Ebola in the state of Missouri,” Nixon said. “Our lab is as good as any anywhere and has been certified to make sure that we will be able to find out as quickly and as professionally as possible if (an Ebola case) occurs.”

Nixon also announced Friday the release of $3.3 million in funds to local health agencies to combat this and other health concerns, such as the flu and foodborne illnesses.

After the Oct. 8 death of the first person to be diagnosed with Ebola in the United States and the subsequent spread of the disease to two nurses, some have raised concerns about the thoroughness of CDC protective standards.

However, Vasterling said that the Missouri health care system has been properly trained in how to respond in the event of an Ebola case. She said hospitals statewide have been following CDC guidelines on protective gear and protocol.

“We had a training session last week with hospitals, emergency management systems, law enforcement, schools, and we had our state epidemiologist do a presentation for all of them. And then they did an exercise,” Vasterling said. “We’re planning to do more of those regionally. We also send out health alerts to update all the medical community within the state when necessary about the Ebola issue.”

The number of people who have contracted Ebola in the U.S. is small in comparison to those in West Africa. According to the CDC’s most recent estimates, West African countries have seen 8,973 cases of Ebola and 4,484 deaths. The continuing outbreak has been blamed on widespread poverty and failing infrastructure of the health care systems in the affected area.

Both Nixon and Vasterling reassured Missouri residents that similar failures are not a part of the state’s health care system.

Ebola is spread through direct contact of bodily fluids, including vomit, semen, sweat and blood. Those who suspect that they have Ebola should contact their local public health agencies.

VETO SESSION: Abortion wait time expected to be hot topic

Columbia Missourian | Sept 10, 2014

JEFFERSON CITY — One of the legislature’s most emotionally charged debates in the veto session, which begins Wednesday, is likely to surround a bill that would triple the wait time for women having an abortion in Missouri.

Currently, that wait time is 24 hours. Advocates of the bill say that women need 72 hours to make an informed decision. Opponents respond that 72 hours of waiting only prolongs the woman’s pain.

For Liz Read-Katz, a Columbia resident and stay-at-home mother who had an abortion in 2011, the notion that 72 hours is beneficial for reflection is misguided.

Read-Katz was 16 weeks pregnant when she learned that her child had a 10 percent chance of having Trisomy 18, a chromosomal defect that few infants survive past birth.

After an amniocentesis confirmed the diagnosis, her doctor told her that the child would know only a short life of suffering. Read-Katz decided to terminate her pregnancy.

Read-Katz was living in Texas at the time. Although Texas has a 24-hour waiting period, she had to wait two weeks while her doctor petitioned the ethics board to allow the abortion at her Christian hospital.

“Waiting has zero impact on women. Once they’ve made the decision, they’ve already thought about it for a lot longer than 72 hours,” Read-Katz said. “No woman wants to have an abortion. They do it because they need to. The only thing a waiting period does is makes the woman hurt more and for longer, emotionally and physically.”

Read-Katz recalled that during her two-week wait, people asked her on a daily basis when her child was due, or whether she would be giving birth to a boy or a girl.

Three years later, House Bill 1307 appeared in the Missouri legislature.  The bill aimed to extend the time between a woman’s initial meeting with the abortion provider and the procedure from 24 hours to 72 hours. The 72-hour period would include no exceptions for victims of rape or incest. The bill passed in the House by a vote of 111-39, and it passed in the Senate 22-9.

In July, Gov. Jay Nixon vetoed the bill.

As it stands now, Missouri law requires that physicians offer women literature on the risks of the procedure and abortion alternatives, including printed materials that “prominently display the following statement: ‘The life of each human being begins at conception. Abortion will terminate the life of a separate, unique, living human being.’”

The physician must also provide the opportunity for women to view an ultrasound, although they are not required to do so. Women must then wait 24 hours before they can give their consent to go through with the procedure.

Extending the wait period to 72 hours would allow women more time to consider all of the information given upon the initial meeting, said Rep. Kevin Elmer, R-Nixa, sponsor of House Bill 1307. Elmer based his bill on the laws of two other states — Utah and South Dakota — that require women to wait 72 hours before an abortion.

The states implemented their laws too recently for statistics on these laws’ effects to be available. However, Dina van der Zalm, volunteer and former legislative intern for Planned Parenthood in Columbia, said she would be cautious of these figures, regardless.

Missouri has one abortion clinic in St. Louis, but van der Zalm said that some women travel to abortion clinics in other states, such as the one in Overland Park, Kan., near Kansas City. Women who opt to receive their abortions in other states will skew the statistics and conclusions drawn from them, van der Zalm said.

“Women have the choice to take all the time they want, but mandating a 72-hour wait increases the economic and emotional burden on women, even more so if they are juggling work schedules and childcare,” van der Zalm said.

Susan Klein, legislative liaison for Missouri Right to Life, sees the wait time as beneficial rather than burdensome.

“When a woman is in a crisis situation, it’s good to reflect on this decision. It’s going to take the life of an innocent child,” Klein said. “On Sept. 10, we’re going to be around to protect those innocent little lives.”

Klein is part of the anti-abortion advocacy groups hosting a #ShowMeLife rally and prayer vigil at the Capitol steps on Wednesday, the first day of the veto session. The groups are confident that the veto will be overturned. In fact, the groups have already scheduled a victory celebration rally for 4 p.m. Wednesday on the Capitol steps.

Read-Katz shared her story on the state Capitol steps in May during a filibuster sponsored by activists, and she plans to be back in Jefferson City on Wednesday to participate in another rally. The Stand With Missouri Women Rally was organized by a coalition of Missouri groups including Planned Parenthood and the American Civil Liberties Union.

The vote to override Nixon’s veto is scheduled for Wednesday. The #ShowMeLife rally will be at noon at the Capitol Rotunda, and the Stand With Missouri Women Rally will begin at 11 a.m. at the state Capitol.

VETO SESSION: Bill regarding sale of e-cigarettes to minors likely to be debated

Columbia Missourian | Sept 10, 2014

JEFFERSON CITY — This spring, both chambers of the Missouri legislature passed a bill making the sale of alternative nicotine products and vapors to minors illegal.

But several months later, the bill was vetoed by Gov. Jay Nixon and was being characterized as a “wolf in sheep’s clothing” by Jeff Harris, senior policy adviser to Nixon.

Senate Bill 841, which was sponsored by Sen. Jay Wasson, R-Nixa, would ban the sale of e-cigarettes and other vapor products to those under 18 and would also exempt the products from being taxed and regulated as tobacco products.

In a roundtable discussion last week in Columbia, Nixon said that the bill began with good intentions, but as the legislature participated in ongoing negotiations, the nature of the bill was changed.

“It may have started out with the purpose of preventing the sale of e-cigarettes to minors, but somewhere along the way, language was added to this bill that would exempt e-cigarettes from the same regulations and taxes as traditional cigarettes,” Nixon said.

Moreover, Harris said, the FDA has proposed rules that would ban the sale of e-cigarettes to minors on a federal scale.

The governor vetoed the bill, which passed with a 27-4 vote in the Senate and 127-19 vote in the House, in July. Both chambers originally approved the bill with the two-thirds majority needed to override Nixon’s veto.

E-cigarettes are meant to imitate traditional cigarettes. When the smoker puffs the e-cigarette, a battery heats up a nicotine-induced liquid solution that then vaporizes.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration notes that since e-cigarettes have not been fully studied, consumers do not know the products’ potential risks and benefits, nor exactly how much nicotine is being inhaled.

Folks like Alex Brousse, assistant manager at Aqueous Vapor in Columbia, find some value in the legislation.

“Agree to disagree, you know?” Brousse said. “They haven’t necessarily proven that e-cigs are harmful. … It’s kind of a no-brainer in a sense that you can choose the route that you know will cause cancer, or you can choose the route that probably won’t.”

Brousse wasn’t entirely opposed to regulations and taxes on e-cigarettes, despite his commitment to them. Regarding extra taxation, he shrugged it off, explaining that “we might have to drop our prices down a little bit to stay reasonable, but besides that I don’t think it’ll be too much of an issue. We’ve all kind of seen it coming for a while now.”

Brousse acknowledged that greater transparency in packing labels on e-liquids would be beneficial, but he dismissed the value of other regulations regarding the distribution and manufacturing of e-cigarettes and other vapor devices.

“E-cigs and the technology develop just like phones. Every month, every week, there’s something new coming out. If they pass regulations that are strict enough, it could probably stop or slow down the development of electronic cigarettes,” Brousse said.

Ultimately, the fate of the e-cigarette in Missouri lies in the hands of the state legislature. The veto session begins at noon Wednesday in the Missouri Senate.

‘Hands Up, Don’t Shoot’ movement seen as rallying cry for change

Columbia Missourian | Aug 18, 2014

Gov. Jay Nixon’s mandated curfew in Ferguson began at midnight Sunday, but Jonathan Butler’s curiosity got the better of him. After midnight Sunday, he stood under pouring rain, about 30 feet behind a group of protestors jeering at the line of police tasked with enforcing the curfew.

At 12:50 a.m., Butler saw bright lights approaching from the end of the street, which he assumed were SWAT trucks. Law enforcement officers gave a last warning for the protestors to disperse, but they stood their ground. A few protestors even moved closer to the police line, Butler said.

A few minutes later, police began throwing tear gas cans at the crowd, and other officers fired rubber bullets.

“When they started popping the first tear gas, there was a taste I couldn’t get out of my mouth,” Butler said. “My nose started running. I just started itching. It was so overpowering that I started to get a headache.”

Butler, an MU graduate student, arrived in Ferguson at about 10 a.m. Saturday to participate in peaceful protest following the fatal shooting of unarmed black teenager Michael Brown by Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson on Aug. 9. At 1:05 a.m. Sunday, he helped protestors and fellow onlookers find safety.

“I was trying to make sure people were OK,” Butler said. “And that’s what kind of amazed me because even though it was a bad situation, you still saw the people come together as a community. Even in that frenzy, there was a real communal aspect of everyone in Ferguson looking out for each other, and that was a unanimous thing the whole day.”

These feelings of support haven’t been contained to Ferguson. Demonstrations using the mantra “Hands Up, Don’t Shoot” have spread throughout the country. The chant was inspired by Brown’s reaction to Wilson’s gunshots, according to eyewitness reports. After Butler returned to Columbia on Sunday, he hosted a #DontShoot photo challenge for MU at 1 p.m.

Several dozen students, staff and faculty as well as members of the community posed in front of the MU Columns. In one photo, they raised both of their hands in solidarity with Brown, and in another, they lifted their right fists. As the photos were taken, their unified chants of  “Hands Up, Don’t Shoot” echoed across Frances Quadrangle.

The #DontShoot photo challenge movement began at Howard University in Washington, D.C. Students raised their hands with the caption “Don’t shoot,” and the photo soon went viral on social media.

“The photo was very simple but very powerful,” Butler said. “It sent a big message that we’re in this together. We’re standing with you.”

MU senior DeShaunya Ware, another photo-challenge participant, shared Butler’s sentiment.

“I’m just here today because black lives are important,”  Ware said. “And we’ve had a lot of losses, and I like to refer to them as the black sacrifice. Nobody deserves to have their life taken away from them. I’m here to show my support because I am Mike Brown.”

Despite incidents of violence after dark, daytime protesting in Ferguson has been peaceful, Ebonie Young said. Young, who graduated from MU in 2012, was in Ferguson on Sunday. She began her day at the site of the Ferguson QuikTrip that was burned down during riots on Aug. 10, where protestors gathered with chants of “Hands up, don’t shoot,” and “No justice, no peace.”

“It was such a welcoming atmosphere,” Young said. “There were people who were giving away chips, drinks and flowers. Every car that was passing was honking their horns. I felt like I stepped back in the 1960s for a second.”

To Butler, the chant harkens back to his experiences as a black man.

“I have been arrested and stopped by the police several times for what I would consider to be profiling,” he said. “In those instances, you fear for your life. Putting your hands up … it’s like saying, I’m unarmed, I don’t have anything against you, I’m a law-abiding citizen. Let’s look at the injustice in that system. Let’s change that.”

Young already sees change due to the movement. As an example, she used a petition being circulated on Change.org to outfit police officers with body cameras in order to hold them accountable. She nicknamed the petition the “Michael Brown Law.”

“Little old St. Louis made national coverage, and it’s opened up people’s eyes to a bigger movement,” Young said. “Change does not happen overnight. This is the beginning of something beautiful.”